ArgMeMatey
06-08-2011, 06:34 AM
I am wondering how many of you Time Warner subscribers still find value in their analog service, even if you have HD from them.
And does anybody have any idea what percentage of TW subscribers use analog in addition to HD?
I've figured that Time Warner's niche, which other providers can't touch, is that you can subscribe to their HD on one or two TVs and get by with analog (and HD locals) on the rest of the TVs in the house. I would have thought that this keeps some unknown number of people from moving to UVerse or satellite.
As we've discussed before, as the number of analog-only subscribers dwindles, they have been re-allocating bandwidth from analog to other services. Just wondering if subscribers are saying "uncle".
I got a cynical chuckle out of TW's PR person quoted in Dudek's column earlier this week. I commented there.
http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/tvradio/123205893.html
And does anybody have any idea what percentage of TW subscribers use analog in addition to HD?
I've figured that Time Warner's niche, which other providers can't touch, is that you can subscribe to their HD on one or two TVs and get by with analog (and HD locals) on the rest of the TVs in the house. I would have thought that this keeps some unknown number of people from moving to UVerse or satellite.
As we've discussed before, as the number of analog-only subscribers dwindles, they have been re-allocating bandwidth from analog to other services. Just wondering if subscribers are saying "uncle".
I got a cynical chuckle out of TW's PR person quoted in Dudek's column earlier this week. I commented there.
http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/tvradio/123205893.html